While researching a topic, a student has taken the following notes:
- The farm-size transition hypothesis predicts that economic pressures associated with modernization result in smaller farms amalgamating into larger-scale commercial farms.
- Masters et al. (2013): The average farm size in Asia "already has or will soon begin to rise."
- Promkhambut et al. (2023) argue that small rice farms in Thailand have adopted modern farming methods without a significant scaling-up of farm size.
- Promkhambut et al.: "The persistence of [small] rice farms [in Thailand] does not represent a 'failure' to modernize...or a 'truncated' transition—it is a response to modernization."
The student wants to make and support a claim regarding the applicability of the farm-size transition hypothesis to Thailand. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?
Explanation
Answer: 2) The predicted shift to large-scale commercial farming may not hold true for rice farms in Thailand, where, according to Promkhambut et al., rice farms have remained small as they've modernized.
Goal: Make and support a claim about the farm-size hypothesis in Thailand.
Why? Making and supporting requires claim plus evidence. Choice 2 claims the hypothesis may not apply and cites Promkhambut's findings.
Traps:
- A) Wrong claim → farms didn't expand
- C) About Asia generally → not specifically Thailand
- D) Claim only → no supporting evidence